🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the UK, and it feels like it’s time for a rethink. Over the years, an event that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has developed a business-like atmosphere, broadening to incorporate events where African descendants are paid to address Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The demonstrations for racial justice in the 2020s sparked an increase in the business of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of commemoration and observance in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this initiative and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the the Kingdom of the Netherlands.

The period has developed since that time, placing less emphasis on the narratives of the slave trade across the Atlantic and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and broadly celebrating the input Black people have made to mold society. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most commonly celebrated, with talks and cultural events. But the method the observance is commemorated is a reflection of the current political situation. How it evolves is a valuable example in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Little demonstrates how critical it is to reconsider Black History Month more than the current time in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is leading the polls. In the warmer months we saw the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Conservative party, is a staunch adversary of Black Lives Matter, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the European continent as a entirety.

In the America, a significant offensive against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the nation. A campaign to remove the history of people of color and experience from the historical documents is in progress. One of the former president's initial presidential directives targeted the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a coordinated and broad attempt to change the national past” by portraying America “as naturally discriminatory”.

In this context, the month symbolises how little it can be impactful if it is confined to either obligatory business commemorations, or politically neutered festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the conditions of the current era. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. A university professor, a professor at University of Greenwich, expressed it perfectly when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the observance. “The problem with adopting a symbolic stance”, she stated, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a transient display rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Determining how to alter, change and broaden efforts for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a treacherous thing. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are no longer suitable, or are vestiges of an time that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of campaigns for equality – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not just to decay as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month seem? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not shy away from politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What use is simple recognition of the bygone era when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the urban areas? Establishments who celebrate it should not be reassured with the passive language of hidden discrimination and sensitivity to “microaggressions”, but confronted with the dangers that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made contemporary, critical, and reactive. Perhaps an complete renaming is in order – Black History is Now Month.